<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Muscle gain Archives - Bodyrecomposition</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/category/muscle-gain/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com</link>
	<description>The Home of Lyle McDonald</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.12</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Another Look at FFMI: Part 3</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-3</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyle McDonald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bodyrecomposition.com/?p=14646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok,it&#8217;s time to to finish my look at the fat free mass index (FFMI) so I can move on to something else whenever I get a bug up my butt to write again.  In <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">Part 1</a>, I examined what the FFMI represents (ostensibly an indicator or screening tool for anabolic steroid use) along with some of the various criticisms that have been brought against it (revolving around late 19th century strongmen and some questionably natural Mr. Universe competitors).</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2">Part 2</a>, I started with an addendum to Part 1, examining the simple fact that tesotsterone was synthesized in 1937, available by 1940, might have been mentioned in 1938 in the primary bodybuilding/fitness magazine of the time and was assuredly in use to some degree by the mid 1940&#8217;s.  This raises severe questions about the claim that any top bodybuilders (including Grimek who had a supposed FFMI higher than Arnold&#8217;s in 1941) were natural.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-3" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-3">Another Look at FFMI: Part 3</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,it&#8217;s time to to finish my look at the fat free mass index (FFMI) so I can move on to something else whenever I get a bug up my butt to write again.  In <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">Part 1</a>, I examined what the FFMI represents (ostensibly an indicator or screening tool for anabolic steroid use) along with some of the various criticisms that have been brought against it (revolving around late 19th century strongmen and some questionably natural Mr. Universe competitors).</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2">Part 2</a>, I started with an addendum to Part 1, examining the simple fact that tesotsterone was synthesized in 1937, available by 1940, might have been mentioned in 1938 in the primary bodybuilding/fitness magazine of the time and was assuredly in use to some degree by the mid 1940&#8217;s.  This raises severe questions about the claim that any top bodybuilders (including Grimek who had a supposed FFMI higher than Arnold&#8217;s in 1941) were natural.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-3" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-3">Another Look at FFMI: Part 3</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Look at FFMI: Part 2</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyle McDonald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bodyrecomposition.com/?p=14644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today I want to continue looking at the Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI) and the idea that exceeding a cutoff point of 25 kg/h^2 is indicative, suggestive or even proves anabolic steroid use.  In <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">Part 1</a>, I defined the concept and looked at the original paper that kicked all of this off.  I also looked at some of the counterarguments against the idea that have been made both online and in an article by Jan Todd in Iron Game History.</p>
<p>Today I want to continue with a re-examination of the topic by first making an addendum to the last part that is critically important.  Then I want to  look at an important physiological distinction and then examining a slightly different issue which is the upper limits of FFM that a human might carry to begin with.  I&#8217;ll finish by asking a cliffhanger question to set up the third and final part.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2">Another Look at FFMI: Part 2</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I want to continue looking at the Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI) and the idea that exceeding a cutoff point of 25 kg/h^2 is indicative, suggestive or even proves anabolic steroid use.  In <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">Part 1</a>, I defined the concept and looked at the original paper that kicked all of this off.  I also looked at some of the counterarguments against the idea that have been made both online and in an article by Jan Todd in Iron Game History.</p>
<p>Today I want to continue with a re-examination of the topic by first making an addendum to the last part that is critically important.  Then I want to  look at an important physiological distinction and then examining a slightly different issue which is the upper limits of FFM that a human might carry to begin with.  I&#8217;ll finish by asking a cliffhanger question to set up the third and final part.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-ffmi-2">Another Look at FFMI: Part 2</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Look at the Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyle McDonald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bodyrecomposition.com/?p=14620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For no other reason than because it&#8217;s on my mind, I want to look at the topic of the Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI) and the idea that it does or does not indicate a natural limit for bodybuilders/weight trainers.   Actually, I take that back, writing this is due to me finding a post I made several months back in my <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/810890695609053/?ref=bookmarks" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook group</a> when I looked in some detail at a paper that was referenced at me in an attempt to disprove or dismiss the idea that an FFMI cutoff existed.</p>
<p>The idea, as I&#8217;ll detail below had to do with the suggestion that there was a cutoff for FFMI that did or could be used to indicate that someone was or was not using anabolic steroids. Since the original concept was originated back in 1995, there has been a lot of back and forth about the topic.  I suspect it kicked off some of the FAKE NATTY nonsense and I&#8217;ve seen various counterarguments against there being a specific FFMI limit that can be used to determine if someone is natural or not.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">Another Look at the Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For no other reason than because it&#8217;s on my mind, I want to look at the topic of the Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI) and the idea that it does or does not indicate a natural limit for bodybuilders/weight trainers.   Actually, I take that back, writing this is due to me finding a post I made several months back in my <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/810890695609053/?ref=bookmarks" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Facebook group</a> when I looked in some detail at a paper that was referenced at me in an attempt to disprove or dismiss the idea that an FFMI cutoff existed.</p>
<p>The idea, as I&#8217;ll detail below had to do with the suggestion that there was a cutoff for FFMI that did or could be used to indicate that someone was or was not using anabolic steroids. Since the original concept was originated back in 1995, there has been a lot of back and forth about the topic.  I suspect it kicked off some of the FAKE NATTY nonsense and I&#8217;ve seen various counterarguments against there being a specific FFMI limit that can be used to determine if someone is natural or not.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">Another Look at the Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determining Calorie Intake for Muscle Gain</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/calories-for-muscle-gain</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=13913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>So there is a fairly short list of topics that I keep meaning to write about and never seem to get around to (I&#8217;m running out of stuff to talk about).  Today is one of those since it addresses a question that gets asked fairly frequently.   And having officially released my <a href="https://store.bodyrecomposition.com/nutrition-injury-recovery/">Nutrition for Injury Recovery e-book</a>, it&#8217;s time to finally get around to it.</p>
<p>That question has to do with what kind of calorie surplus is optimal for muscle gain.  That is, people continuously ask what kind of daily, or weekly, or monthly surplus is required to optimize muscle gain and hopefully avoid excessive fat gain.  And, at long last, having run out of podcasts to post links to for a bit, I want to address that question.</p>
<p>Now I have mentioned this at least obliquely in earlier articles, primarily the one on the <a href="https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-energy-balance-equation.html/">energy balance equation</a> but I want to look at it more comprehensively here. &#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/calories-for-muscle-gain" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/calories-for-muscle-gain">Determining Calorie Intake for Muscle Gain</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there is a fairly short list of topics that I keep meaning to write about and never seem to get around to (I&#8217;m running out of stuff to talk about).  Today is one of those since it addresses a question that gets asked fairly frequently.   And having officially released my <a href="https://store.bodyrecomposition.com/nutrition-injury-recovery/">Nutrition for Injury Recovery e-book</a>, it&#8217;s time to finally get around to it.</p>
<p>That question has to do with what kind of calorie surplus is optimal for muscle gain.  That is, people continuously ask what kind of daily, or weekly, or monthly surplus is required to optimize muscle gain and hopefully avoid excessive fat gain.  And, at long last, having run out of podcasts to post links to for a bit, I want to address that question.</p>
<p>Now I have mentioned this at least obliquely in earlier articles, primarily the one on the <a href="https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-energy-balance-equation.html/">energy balance equation</a> but I want to look at it more comprehensively here. &hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/calories-for-muscle-gain" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/calories-for-muscle-gain">Determining Calorie Intake for Muscle Gain</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Transition Phase Between Dieting and Gaining</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-transition-phase</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fat loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=13577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I received a question in my having to do with manipulating calories and macronutrients for optimal transitioning from gaining to dieting phases and vice versa and this seemed like an excellent impetus to write about this topic in some detail.</p>
<p>Because while a lot of people tend to jump back and forth from one to the other (often, I think, spinning their wheels a bit), taking a more long-term approach, a nutritional periodization of sorts, can be beneficial in terms of working with rather than against the body&#8217;s inherent physiology.</p>
<h2>Gaining to Dieting: The Pre-Diet Phase</h2>
<p>Way back in the early days of bodybuilding you would hear physique athletes talk about a &#8220;hardening phase&#8221; which was meant as a transition from their off-season bulking to their contest diet.  Now, in hindsight, it probably had as much to do with switching out their drugs from heavy androgens to more anabolic compounds to reduce water retention but it basically entailed &#8220;cleaning up the diet&#8221; to prepare for the actual contest prep.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-transition-phase" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-transition-phase">The Transition Phase Between Dieting and Gaining</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received a question in my having to do with manipulating calories and macronutrients for optimal transitioning from gaining to dieting phases and vice versa and this seemed like an excellent impetus to write about this topic in some detail.</p>
<p>Because while a lot of people tend to jump back and forth from one to the other (often, I think, spinning their wheels a bit), taking a more long-term approach, a nutritional periodization of sorts, can be beneficial in terms of working with rather than against the body&#8217;s inherent physiology.</p>
<h2>Gaining to Dieting: The Pre-Diet Phase</h2>
<p>Way back in the early days of bodybuilding you would hear physique athletes talk about a &#8220;hardening phase&#8221; which was meant as a transition from their off-season bulking to their contest diet.  Now, in hindsight, it probably had as much to do with switching out their drugs from heavy androgens to more anabolic compounds to reduce water retention but it basically entailed &#8220;cleaning up the diet&#8221; to prepare for the actual contest prep.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-transition-phase" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-transition-phase">The Transition Phase Between Dieting and Gaining</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anabolic Steroids and Muscle Growth</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/anabolic-steroids-muscle-growth</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=10372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since at least the 1970&#8217;s and probably much earlier than that, anabolic steroids have been part of sport.  Testosterone was first synthesized in the 30&#8217;s and there are rumors of bodybuilders using it <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">fairly early in the game</a>.    Even then, many like to downplay the impact of the drugs, <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/training/do-drugs-only-help-a-little">claiming they only help a little</a>.    And, well, I disagree. So today I want to look at what is a somewhat unusual topic for me, the topic of anabolic steroids and muscle growth.</p>
<h2>I am Not an Anabolic Steroid Expert</h2>
<p>Ok, let me start this with a disclaimer: I am not a steroid guy. I know enough to be a little bit dangerous and can throw around big words like leutinizing hormone and steroidogenesis but that&#8217;s about it.  I&#8217;ve read most of the major books (and I have both Duchaine&#8217;s Ultimate Steroid Handbook and USHII so nyah nyah) because it interests me on some level but that&#8217;s it.   &#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/anabolic-steroids-muscle-growth" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/anabolic-steroids-muscle-growth">Anabolic Steroids and Muscle Growth</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since at least the 1970&#8217;s and probably much earlier than that, anabolic steroids have been part of sport.  Testosterone was first synthesized in the 30&#8217;s and there are rumors of bodybuilders using it <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/another-look-at-the-ffmi">fairly early in the game</a>.    Even then, many like to downplay the impact of the drugs, <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/training/do-drugs-only-help-a-little">claiming they only help a little</a>.    And, well, I disagree. So today I want to look at what is a somewhat unusual topic for me, the topic of anabolic steroids and muscle growth.</p>
<h2>I am Not an Anabolic Steroid Expert</h2>
<p>Ok, let me start this with a disclaimer: I am not a steroid guy. I know enough to be a little bit dangerous and can throw around big words like leutinizing hormone and steroidogenesis but that&#8217;s about it.  I&#8217;ve read most of the major books (and I have both Duchaine&#8217;s Ultimate Steroid Handbook and USHII so nyah nyah) because it interests me on some level but that&#8217;s it.   &hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/anabolic-steroids-muscle-growth" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/anabolic-steroids-muscle-growth">Anabolic Steroids and Muscle Growth</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Guide to Beginning Weight Training: Part 4</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-4</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=3009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Having examined the basic loading parameters for beginners routines in <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3">Part 4</a> I want to look at a few example programs that incorporate everything I&#8217;ve talked about.    Please consider these only as sample routines and nothing more.</p>
<h2>My Beginner Machine Program</h2>
<p>I might as well get the &#8220;simplest&#8221; beginner program out of the way which is a basic machine circuit.  This is actually the routine that I used with the majority of my beginner clients.  Do realize that I was typically working with mid-30&#8217;s or older individuals without a training or movements background.</p>
<p>They were intimidated enough without my giving them exercises they couldn&#8217;t do well from the get go.  So I would start with simpler machines and then worry about teaching more complex things later down the road.  In many cases, I only had them for 3 sessions to begin with.</p>
<p>For that reason, I had to choose exercises that they could do safely and competently after only 3 teaching sessions. &#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-4" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-4">A Guide to Beginning Weight Training: Part 4</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having examined the basic loading parameters for beginners routines in <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3">Part 4</a> I want to look at a few example programs that incorporate everything I&#8217;ve talked about.    Please consider these only as sample routines and nothing more.</p>
<h2>My Beginner Machine Program</h2>
<p>I might as well get the &#8220;simplest&#8221; beginner program out of the way which is a basic machine circuit.  This is actually the routine that I used with the majority of my beginner clients.  Do realize that I was typically working with mid-30&#8217;s or older individuals without a training or movements background.</p>
<p>They were intimidated enough without my giving them exercises they couldn&#8217;t do well from the get go.  So I would start with simpler machines and then worry about teaching more complex things later down the road.  In many cases, I only had them for 3 sessions to begin with.</p>
<p>For that reason, I had to choose exercises that they could do safely and competently after only 3 teaching sessions. &hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-4" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-4">A Guide to Beginning Weight Training: Part 4</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Guide to Beginning Weight Training: Part 3</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=2985</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Continuing from <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/training/beginning-weight-training-2">Part 2</a>, I want to start looking at some specifics in terms of what are called loading parameters of training. This includes issues such as intensity (how hard), volume (how much), frequency (how often) and I&#8217;ll touch on exercise selection again.  Quite a bit of research has actually looked at these topics in beginners (I&#8217;m unaware of much on exercise selection) and that goes a long way towards guiding the development of proper beginner programs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d make the point again that one huge assumption that is going into what I&#8217;m going to write is that the individual has no underlying issues (such as muscular imbalances or injury) that are oh so common in the modern world.   In those specific cases, an &#8220;imbalanced&#8221; program may be required to fix things.  But since I can&#8217;t cover that in any detail, I&#8217;m going to draw up what is basically a &#8216;balanced&#8217; beginner routine.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3">A Guide to Beginning Weight Training: Part 3</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing from <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/training/beginning-weight-training-2">Part 2</a>, I want to start looking at some specifics in terms of what are called loading parameters of training. This includes issues such as intensity (how hard), volume (how much), frequency (how often) and I&#8217;ll touch on exercise selection again.  Quite a bit of research has actually looked at these topics in beginners (I&#8217;m unaware of much on exercise selection) and that goes a long way towards guiding the development of proper beginner programs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d make the point again that one huge assumption that is going into what I&#8217;m going to write is that the individual has no underlying issues (such as muscular imbalances or injury) that are oh so common in the modern world.   In those specific cases, an &#8220;imbalanced&#8221; program may be required to fix things.  But since I can&#8217;t cover that in any detail, I&#8217;m going to draw up what is basically a &#8216;balanced&#8217; beginner routine.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/beginning-weight-training-3">A Guide to Beginning Weight Training: Part 3</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass Made Simple by Dan John</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/mass-made-simple-dan-john-review</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=5879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5880" style="border: 10px solid black; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Mass Made Simple by Dan John" src="https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover.jpg" alt="Mass Made Simple by Dan John" width="250" height="321" srcset="https://bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover.jpg 250w, https://bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover-233x300.jpg 233w" sizes="(max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" /></a>In a previous site update, I did a review of <a title="Dan John's Never Let Go - Product Review" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/training/never-let-go-by-dan-john-review">Dan John&#8217;s Never Let Go</a>, effectively a collection of articles he had written talking about his various and sundry experiences in the weight game.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a book I highly recommend, if not for the training wisdom it contains then for its highly entertaining and readable style.  I reread it about once a year and something in it always manages to make me chuckle or think.</p>
<p>As a collection of articles there wasn&#8217;t really any single theme that ran through it except for perhaps the fact that Dan is as old as the hills and has truly seen it and done it all when it comes to the weight room.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m fairly sure Dan was the guy who pointed Milo at the bull and told him to get cracking.  Hell, Dan might have been the bull.  For those who have truly been living under a rock, as the story goes, Milo lifted a bull on a daily basis.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/mass-made-simple-dan-john-review" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/mass-made-simple-dan-john-review">Mass Made Simple by Dan John</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5880" style="border: 10px solid black; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Mass Made Simple by Dan John" src="https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover.jpg" alt="Mass Made Simple by Dan John" width="250" height="321" srcset="https://bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover.jpg 250w, https://bodyrecomposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Mass-front-cover-233x300.jpg 233w" sizes="(max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" /></a>In a previous site update, I did a review of <a title="Dan John's Never Let Go - Product Review" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/training/never-let-go-by-dan-john-review">Dan John&#8217;s Never Let Go</a>, effectively a collection of articles he had written talking about his various and sundry experiences in the weight game.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a book I highly recommend, if not for the training wisdom it contains then for its highly entertaining and readable style.  I reread it about once a year and something in it always manages to make me chuckle or think.</p>
<p>As a collection of articles there wasn&#8217;t really any single theme that ran through it except for perhaps the fact that Dan is as old as the hills and has truly seen it and done it all when it comes to the weight room.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m fairly sure Dan was the guy who pointed Milo at the bull and told him to get cracking.  Hell, Dan might have been the bull.  For those who have truly been living under a rock, as the story goes, Milo lifted a bull on a daily basis.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/mass-made-simple-dan-john-review" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/mass-made-simple-dan-john-review">Mass Made Simple by Dan John</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dietary Supplements for Athletes</title>
		<link>https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/dietary-supplements-for-athletes</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lylemcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Muscle gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/?p=3563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If there is a chronically recurring topic/question I get or see it involves the issue of dietary supplements.  Both athletes and the general public are endlessly fascinated by them with unscrupulous marketing companies taking advantage of that fascination.  To address the issue, I&#8217;m presenting more or less the entirety of  Chapter 11 from my <a href="https://store.bodyrecomposition.com/nutrition-mixed-sports/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Applied Nutrition for Mixed Sports Book/DVD Bundle</a>.  This list is not meant to be comprehensive and there are always <a href="https://journals.lww.com/nsca-scj/Abstract/9000/Emerging_Nutritional_Supplements_for_Strength_and.99266.aspx?fbclid=IwAR0OpNI-e2Kf6iJe5tRcoAbBBDuFppMQwrmzZ8ouyPGWb-ySExxhbGh6rZ4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">newer products that may show promise down the road</a>.</p>
<h2>Chapter 11: Dietary Supplements for Athletes</h2>
<p>If there is a single area of sports nutrition that is constantly changing (in terms of the products being marketed) and which athletes are always interested in it&#8217;s dietary supplements. As I mentioned in Chapter 2 of this book, I consider supplementation to be the third tier of the pyramid (after overall daily nutrition and around workout nutrition) in terms of what athletes should concern themselves with.&#8230; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/dietary-supplements-for-athletes" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/dietary-supplements-for-athletes">Dietary Supplements for Athletes</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a chronically recurring topic/question I get or see it involves the issue of dietary supplements.  Both athletes and the general public are endlessly fascinated by them with unscrupulous marketing companies taking advantage of that fascination.  To address the issue, I&#8217;m presenting more or less the entirety of  Chapter 11 from my <a href="https://store.bodyrecomposition.com/nutrition-mixed-sports/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Applied Nutrition for Mixed Sports Book/DVD Bundle</a>.  This list is not meant to be comprehensive and there are always <a href="https://journals.lww.com/nsca-scj/Abstract/9000/Emerging_Nutritional_Supplements_for_Strength_and.99266.aspx?fbclid=IwAR0OpNI-e2Kf6iJe5tRcoAbBBDuFppMQwrmzZ8ouyPGWb-ySExxhbGh6rZ4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">newer products that may show promise down the road</a>.</p>
<h2>Chapter 11: Dietary Supplements for Athletes</h2>
<p>If there is a single area of sports nutrition that is constantly changing (in terms of the products being marketed) and which athletes are always interested in it&#8217;s dietary supplements. As I mentioned in Chapter 2 of this book, I consider supplementation to be the third tier of the pyramid (after overall daily nutrition and around workout nutrition) in terms of what athletes should concern themselves with.&hellip; <a href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/dietary-supplements-for-athletes" class="read-more">Keep Reading </a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com/muscle-gain/dietary-supplements-for-athletes">Dietary Supplements for Athletes</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://bodyrecomposition.com">Bodyrecomposition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
